Since I've started using WordRake, I've had a major improvement over MS editing functions. WordRake just unveiled its new Simplicity mode, offering a whole new approach to editing for lawyers looking to make their writing comply with new edicts encouraging plain language choices. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Other than that, I'd for sure recommend Wordrake to anyone who needs a personal editor, available every hour of every day, that never tires, and can help anyone in any profession write clearly and concisely. Recommendations to others considering the product:
This could lead to the user not willing to install the software anymore.
Also the website isn't well displayed since it could use more images to help develop a better understanding with the user. I've noticed how the website itself doesn't really define or state its exact purpose which may confuse many. The bureau is comprised of top journalists who have written for and edited some of the best-known and well-respected publications in the legal industry, including The American Lawyer, The National Law Journal, The New York Law Journal, Corporate Counsel, Law Technology News, among others. What attracts traffic to any software/website is its ability to communicate with the user. A major improvement over MS editing functions, and no competitor even comes close. It is by far the most sophisticated style editor out there, especially for legal briefs and other documents that are already good, but need tightening.
0 kommentar(er)
